A 5-Year Follow-Up after Endovascular Treatment of 402 Intracranial Aneurysms—A Single-Centre Experience

Scientific paper - Original scientific paper

• Author: Ana Repić Buličić
• Author: David Ozretić
• Author: Marko Radoš
• Author: Josip Ljevak
• Author: Antonela Bazina Martinović
• Author: Zdravka Poljaković Skurić
• Author's institution: University of Zagreb; School of Medicine; (Department of Neurology)
• Author's institution: University of Zagreb; School of Medicine; (Department of Radiology)
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE; Clinical Medical Sciences; Neurology
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE; Clinical Medical Sciences; Radiology

Abstract (english)

The aim of our study was to evaluate the early and long-term clinical and morphological outcomes of the endovascular treatment of ruptured and non-ruptured intracranial aneurysms in a cohort of patients from a single centre. We retrospectively analysed the treatment outcomes of 402 endovascularly treated intracranial aneurysms with an average follow-up of 5.5 years. All included patients were treated with endovascular techniques (coil, stent or both). We analysed patient demographics, risk factors for an aneurysm rupture, aneurysm characteristics, and clinical and angiographic complications and outcomes. We analysed and compared the data from the two groups, ruptured aneurysms (RAs) and unruptured aneurysms (UAs), separately. Out of the 318 patients included, a good early clinical outcome was achieved in 78.5% of RAs and in 95.3% of UAs. No complications occurred in 87.71% of patients with UAs and in 80.45% with RAs. The periprocedural rupture rate for UAs and RAs was 0.8% and 2.2%, respectively. The rate of thromboembolic events was 4.8 and 8% for UAs and RAs, respectively. A retreatment due to the recanalisation was required in 9.21% of patients with UAs and in 16.66% of patients with RAs. The results from our centre showed an overall favourable clinical outcome with acceptable periprocedural complications for both RAs and UR aneurysms and proved the endovascular method as safe and effective in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

• Keywords (english): complications; endovascular treatment; intracranial aneurysm; retreatment; rupture risk
• Language: english
• Publication type: Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
• Publication status: Published
• Peer review: Peer review
• Publication version: Published version
• Journal title: Biomedicines
• Numbering: vol. 12, no. 6, 1231
• e-ISSN: 2227-9059
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12061231
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:105:070495
• Publication: 2024-06-01
• Document URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/12/6/1231
• Type of resource: Text
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2025-01-20 11:33:16