Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after cesarean section: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Scientific paper - Review paper

• Author: Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema
• Author: Aamna Badar Ahmad
• Author: Muhammad Ehsan
• Author: Abia Shahid
• Author: Muhammad Ayyan
• Author: Saleha Azeem
• Author: Ayesha Hussain
• Author: Aden Shahid
• Author: Abdulqadir J. Nashwan
• Author: Mislav Mikuš
• Author: Antonio Simone Laganà
• Author's institution: University of Zagreb; School of Medicine; (Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics)
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE; Clinical Medical Sciences; Gynecology and Obstetrics

Abstract (english)

Objective: Tranexamic acid is a cost-effective intervention for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage among women who undergo cesarean delivery, but the evidence to support its use is conflicting. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in low- and high-risk cesarean deliveries.

Data sources: We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal from inception to April 2022 (updated October 2022 and February 2023) with no language restrictions. In addition, grey literature sources were also explored.

Study eligibility criteria: All randomized controlled trials that investigated the prophylactic use of intravenous tranexamic acid in addition to standard uterotonic agents among women who underwent cesarean deliveries in comparison with a placebo, standard treatment, or prostaglandins were included in this meta-analysis.

Methods: We used the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) to assess the quality of the included randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct all statistical analyses using a random-effects model.

Results: We included 50 randomized controlled trials (6 in only high-risk patients and 2 with prostaglandins as the comparator) that evaluated tranexamic acid in our meta-analysis. Tranexamic acid reduced the risk for blood loss >1000 mL, the mean total blood loss, and the need for blood transfusion in both low- and high-risk patients. Tranexamic acid was associated with a beneficial effect in the secondary outcomes, including a decline in hemoglobin levels and the need for additional uterotonic agents. Tranexamic acid increased the risk for nonthromboembolic adverse events but, based on limited data, did not increase the incidence of thromboembolic events. The administration of tranexamic acid before skin incision, but not after cord clamping, was associated with a large benefit. The quality of evidence was rated as low to very low for outcomes in the low-risk population and moderate for most outcomes in the high-risk subgroup.

Conclusion: Tranexamic acid may reduce the risk for blood loss in cesarean deliveries with a higher benefit observed in high-risk patients, but the lack of high-quality evidence precludes any strong conclusions. The administration of tranexamic acid before skin incision, but not after cord clamping, was associated with a large benefit. Additional studies, especially in the high-risk population and focused on evaluating the timing of tranexamic acid administration, are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

• Keywords (english): Antifibrinolytic Agents / adverse effects; Blood Loss, Surgical / prevention & control; Cesarean Section / adverse effects; Female; Humans; Postpartum Hemorrhage / etiology; Postpartum Hemorrhage / prevention & control; Pregnancy; Prostaglandins / therapeutic use; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tranexamic Acid / adverse effects
• Language: english
• Publication type: Scientific paper - Review paper
• Publication status: Published
• Peer review: Peer review
• Publication version: Published version
• Journal title: American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
• Numbering: vol. 5, no. 8, 101049
• p-ISSN: 2589-9333
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101049
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:105:251380
• Publication: 2023-08
• Document URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S258993332300191X
• Type of resource: Text
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2023-10-02 08:05:50