prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, G
  Download
PDF 314.69 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey
European Radiology, 27 (2017), 7; 2737-2743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z
Sardanelli, Francesco; Aase, Hildegunn S.; Álvarez, Marina; Azavedo, Edward; Baarslag, Henk J.; Balleyguier, Corinne; Baltzer, Pascal A.; Beslagic, Vanesa; Bick, Ulrich; Bogdanovic-Stojanovic, Dragana; Briediene, Ruta; Brkljačić, Boris; Camps Herrero, Julia; Colin, Catherine; Cornford, Eleanor; Danes, Jan; de Geer, Gérard; Esen, Gul; Evans, Andrew; Fuchsjaeger, Michael H.; Gilbert, Fiona J.; Graf, Oswald; Hargaden, Gormlaith; Helbich, Thomas H.; Heywang-Köbrunner, Sylvia H.; Ivanov, Valentin; Jónsson, Ásbjörn; Kuhl, Christiane K.; Lisencu, Eugenia C.; Luczynska, Elzbieta; Mann, Ritse M.; Marques, Jose C.; Martincich, Laura; Mortier, Margarete; Müller-Schimpfle, Markus; Ormandi, Katalin; Panizza, Pietro; Pediconi, Federica; Pijnappel, Ruud M.; Pinker, Katja; Rissanen, Tarja; Rotaru, Natalia; Saguatti, Gianni; Sella, Tamar; Slobodníková, Jana; Talk, Maret; Taourel, Patrice; Trimboli, Rubina M.; Vejborg, Ilse; Vourtsis, Athina; Forrai, Gabor More authors...

Cite this document

Sardanelli, F., Aase, H. S., Álvarez, M., Azavedo, E., Baarslag, H. J., Balleyguier, C. ... Forrai, G. (2017). Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey. European Radiology, 27. (7), 2737-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z

Sardanelli, Francesco, et al. "Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey." European Radiology, vol. 27, no. 7, 2017, pp. 2737-2743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z

Sardanelli, Francesco, Hildegunn S. Aase, Marina Álvarez, Edward Azavedo, Henk J. Baarslag, Corinne Balleyguier, Pascal A. Baltzer, et al. "Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey." European Radiology 27, no. 7 (2017): 2737-2743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z

Sardanelli, F., et al. (2017) 'Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey', European Radiology, 27(7), pp. 2737-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z

Sardanelli F, Aase HS, Álvarez M, Azavedo E, Baarslag HJ, Balleyguier C, and sur.. Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey. European Radiology [Internet]. 2017 July [cited 2024 May 04];27(7):2737-2743. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z

F. Sardanelli, et al., "Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey", European Radiology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 2737-2743, July 2017. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:265617. [Accessed: 04 May 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey
AuthorFrancesco Sardanelli
AuthorHildegunn S. Aase
AuthorMarina Álvarez
AuthorEdward Azavedo
AuthorHenk J. Baarslag
AuthorCorinne Balleyguier
AuthorPascal A. Baltzer
AuthorVanesa Beslagic
AuthorUlrich Bick
AuthorDragana Bogdanovic-Stojanovic
AuthorRuta Briediene
AuthorBoris Brkljačić
AuthorJulia Camps Herrero
AuthorCatherine Colin
AuthorEleanor Cornford
AuthorJan Danes
AuthorGérard de Geer
AuthorGul Esen
AuthorAndrew Evans
AuthorMichael H. Fuchsjaeger
AuthorFiona J. Gilbert
AuthorOswald Graf
AuthorGormlaith Hargaden
AuthorThomas H. Helbich
AuthorSylvia H. Heywang-Köbrunner
AuthorValentin Ivanov
AuthorÁsbjörn Jónsson
AuthorChristiane K. Kuhl
AuthorEugenia C. Lisencu
AuthorElzbieta Luczynska
AuthorRitse M. Mann
AuthorJose C. Marques
AuthorLaura Martincich
AuthorMargarete Mortier
AuthorMarkus Müller-Schimpfle
AuthorKatalin Ormandi
AuthorPietro Panizza
AuthorFederica Pediconi
AuthorRuud M. Pijnappel
AuthorKatja Pinker
AuthorTarja Rissanen
AuthorNatalia Rotaru
AuthorGianni Saguatti
AuthorTamar Sella
AuthorJana Slobodníková
AuthorMaret Talk
AuthorPatrice Taourel
AuthorRubina M. Trimboli
AuthorIlse Vejborg
AuthorAthina Vourtsis
AuthorGabor Forrai
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Abstract (english)
EUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support mammography for population-based screening, demonstrated to reduce breast cancer (BC) mortality and treatment impact. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the reduction in mortality is 40 % for women aged 50-69 years taking up the invitation while the probability of false-positive needle biopsy is <1 % per round and overdiagnosis is only 1-10 % for a 20-year screening. Mortality reduction was also observed for the age groups 40-49 years and 70-74 years, although with "limited evidence". Thus, we firstly recommend biennial screening mammography for average-risk women aged 50-69 years; extension up to 73 or 75 years, biennially, is a second priority, from 40-45 to 49 years, annually, a third priority. Screening with thermography or other optical tools as alternatives to mammography is discouraged. Preference should be given to population screening programmes on a territorial basis, with double reading. Adoption of digital mammography (not film-screen or phosphor-plate computer radiography) is a priority, which also improves sensitivity in dense breasts. Radiologists qualified as screening readers should be involved in programmes. Digital breast tomosynthesis is also set to become "routine mammography" in the screening setting in the next future. Dedicated pathways for high-risk women offering breast MRI according to national or international guidelines and recommendations are encouraged.
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleEuropean Radiology
Numberingvol. 27, no. 7, pp. 2737-2743
p-ISSN0938-7994
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:265617
Publication2017-07
Document URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-03-28 09:12:13