prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study)
  Download
PDF 76.89 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study)
Collegium Antropologicum, 33 (2009), 3; 791-797. urn:nbn:hr:105:278408
Jurjević, Matija; Matić, Ivo; Šakić-Zdravčević, Katarina; Šakić, Šimun; Đanić, Davorin; Buković, Damir

Cite this document

Jurjević, M., Matić, I., Šakić Zdravčević, K., Šakić, Š., Đanić, D. & Buković, D. (2009). Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study) . Collegium Antropologicum, 33. (3), 791-797. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:278408

Jurjević, Matija, et al. "Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study) ." Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 33, no. 3, 2009, pp. 791-797. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:278408

Jurjević, Matija, Ivo Matić, Katarina Šakić Zdravčević, Šimun Šakić, Davorin Đanić and Damir Buković. "Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study) ." Collegium Antropologicum 33, no. 3 (2009): 791-797. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:278408

Jurjević, M., et al. (2009) 'Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study) ', Collegium Antropologicum, 33(3), pp. 791-797. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:278408 (Accessed 06 October 2024)

Jurjević M, Matić I, Šakić Zdravčević K, Šakić Š, Đanić D, Buković D. Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study) . Collegium Antropologicum [Internet]. 2009 September [cited 2024 October 06];33(3):791-797. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:278408

M. Jurjević, I. Matić, K. Šakić Zdravčević, Š. Šakić, D. Đanić and D. Buković, "Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study) ", Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 791-797, September 2009. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:278408. [Accessed: 06 October 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Mechanical ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, noninvasive vs. invasive method (randomized prospective study)
Title (croatian)Usporedba neinvazivne i invazivne umjetne ventilacije kod bolesnika s kroničnom opstruktivnom plućnom bolesti: prospektivna randomizirana studija
AuthorMatija Jurjević
AuthorIvo Matić
AuthorKatarina Šakić-Zdravčević
AuthorŠimun Šakić
AuthorDavorin Đanić
AuthorDamir Buković
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Abstract (english)
Acute respiratory failure due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presents an increasing problem throughout the world. The aim of this study was to compare invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) for patients with COPD. A prospective, randomized trial was performed in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit for the period of 36 months and included 156 patients with COPD. MV procedure was performed using standard methods, and was applied as either invasive MV (IMV) or noninvasive MV (NIMV). Patients were randomized in two groups for application of MV using closed, nontransparent envelops. Comparison was made based on patient characteristics, objective parameters on admission and 1h, 4h, 24h, and 48h after admission and based on treatment outcome. We have confirmed that NIMV method is superior to IMV for patients with COPD. MV duration NIMV:IMV was 94:172 hours, p<0.001, time spent in Intensive Care Unit 120:223 hours, p<0.001. Ventilator associated pneumonia 5(6%):29(37%), p<0.001.The advantage of NIMV in COPD patients, especially in the early stages was confirmed.
Abstract (croatian)
Akutno respiratorno zatajenje uzrokovano kroničnom opstruktivnom plućnom bolesti (KOPB) predstavlja rastući problem širom svijeta. Cilj ove studije bila je usporedba invazivne i neinvazivne umjetne ventilacije (UV) kod bolesnika sa KOPB. Ova prospektivna, randomizirana studija je trajala 36 mjeseci i provedena je u multidisciplinarnoj jedinici intenzivnog liječenja. Uključivala je 156 bolesnika sa KOPB. UV je provođena primjenom standardnih metoda, a primjenjivana je kao invazivna UV (IUV) ili neinvazivna UV (NIUV). Bolesnici su randomizirani u dvije skupine za primjenu UV korištenjem zatvorenih, neprozirnih omotnica. Usporedba je provedena na osnovi karakteristika bolesnika, objektivnih parametara kod prijema, 1h, 4h, 24h i 48h nakon prijema te na osnovi parametara ishoda liječenja. Istraživanje je potvrdilo prednost NIUV u odnosu na IUV kod bolesnika sa KOPB. Trajanje UV NIUV:IUV bilo je 94:172h, p<0,001, vrijeme provedeno u jedinici intenzivnog liječenja 120:223h, p<0,001. Pojavnost ventilator udružene pneumonije bila je 5(6%):29(37%), p<0,001. Potvrđena je prednost NIUV kod KOPB bolesnika, osobito u ranijim stadijima bolesti.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionAccepted version
Journal titleCollegium Antropologicum
Numberingvol. 33, no. 3, pp. 791-797
p-ISSN0350-6134
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:278408
Publication2009-09
Document URLhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/41819
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-03-28 11:27:11