prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy
  Download
PDF 1.77 MB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy
Kidney International Reports, 7 (2021), 1; 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.014
Haas, Mark; Mirocha, James; Amann, Kerstin; Bajema, Ingeborg M.; Barisoni, Laura; Becker, Jan Ulrich; Jennette, J. Charles; Joh, Kenuske; Galešić Ljubanović, Danica; Roberts, Ian S.D.; Roelofs, Joris J.; Sethi, Sanjeev; Suarez, Raul; Zeng, Caihong; Seshan, Surya V. More authors...

Cite this document

Haas, M., Mirocha, J., Amann, K., Bajema, I. M., Barisoni, L., Becker, J. U. ... Seshan, S. V. (2021). Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy. Kidney International Reports, 7. (1), 78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.014

Haas, Mark, et al. "Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy." Kidney International Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021, pp. 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.014

Haas, Mark, James Mirocha, Kerstin Amann, Ingeborg M. Bajema, Laura Barisoni, Jan Ulrich Becker, J. Charles Jennette, et al. "Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy." Kidney International Reports 7, no. 1 (2021): 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.014

Haas, M., et al. (2021) 'Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy', Kidney International Reports, 7(1), pp. 78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.014

Haas M, Mirocha J, Amann K, Bajema IM, Barisoni L, Becker JU, and sur.. Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy. Kidney International Reports [Internet]. 2021 October 29 [cited 2024 April 19];7(1):78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.014

M. Haas, et al., "Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy", Kidney International Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 78-86, October 2021. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:104705. [Accessed: 19 April 2024]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Impact of Consensus Definitions on Identification of Glomerular Lesions by Light and Electron Microscopy
AuthorMark Haas
AuthorJames Mirocha
AuthorKerstin Amann
AuthorIngeborg M. Bajema
AuthorLaura Barisoni
AuthorJan Ulrich Becker
AuthorJ. Charles Jennette
AuthorKenuske Joh
AuthorDanica Galešić Ljubanović
AuthorIan S.D. Roberts
AuthorJoris J. Roelofs
AuthorSanjeev Sethi
AuthorRaul Suarez
AuthorCaihong Zeng
AuthorSurya V. Seshan
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
(Department of Pathology)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Pathology
Abstract (english)
Introduction: In 2020, a working group of 13 renal pathologists published consensus definitions for 47 individual glomerular lesions found on light microscopy (LM) and 47 glomerular lesions and 9 normal structures found on electron microscopy (EM). ------ Methods: To test the impact of these definitions on identification of these lesions and structures, 2 surveys were circulated to all members of the Renal Pathology Society (RPS), each having 32 images (19 LM, 13 EM) and accompanying questions with 5 multiple-choice answers, one being the consensus choice of the working group. The first survey (survey 1 [S1]), answered by 297 RPS members, was sent in September 2020, before publication of the consensus definitions. The second (survey 2 [S2]), with images of the same lesions and structures (but not the same images) and the same questions and multiple choices in different order, was sent in April 2020, 5 months after the publication of the definitions. ----- Results: S2 was taken by 181 RPS members; 64% also took S1 and 61% reported having read the definitions paper (def. paper). Mean agreement with the consensus answers increased modestly between the 2 surveys (65.2% vs. 72.0%, P = 0.097); the increase was greater and significant when only respondents to S2 who read the def. paper were considered (65.2% vs. 74.8%, P = 0.026). Furthermore, in S2 agreement with consensus answers was greater among respondents who read this paper versus those who did not (66.9% vs. 74.8%, P < 0.0001). ----- Conclusions: Publication of the consensus definitions modestly improved interobserver agreement in identification of glomerular lesions.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleKidney International Reports
Numberingvol. 7, no. 1, pp. 78-86
p-ISSN2468-0249
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.014
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:104705
Publication2021-10-29
Document URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468024921014972
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) icon
Created on2022-07-07 07:12:16