prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?
  Download
PDF 102.88 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?
Collegium Antropologicum, 30 (2006), 3; 489-493. urn:nbn:hr:105:665196
Dvornik-Radica, Ana; Rudan, Vlasta; Jureša, Vesna; Ivanković, Davor; Rumboldt, Mirjana; Smoje, Elvira; Vrdoljak, Davorka; Mrduljaš-Đujić, Nataša

Cite this document

Dvornik Radica, A., Rudan, V., Jureša, V., Ivanković, D., Rumboldt, M., Smoje, E. ... Mrduljaš Đujić, N. (2006). Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?. Collegium Antropologicum, 30. (3), 489-493. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:665196

Dvornik Radica, Ana, et al. "Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?." Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 30, no. 3, 2006, pp. 489-493. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:665196

Dvornik Radica, Ana, Vlasta Rudan, Vesna Jureša, Davor Ivanković, Mirjana Rumboldt, Elvira Smoje, Davorka Vrdoljak and Nataša Mrduljaš Đujić. "Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?." Collegium Antropologicum 30, no. 3 (2006): 489-493. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:665196

Dvornik Radica, A., et al. (2006) 'Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?', Collegium Antropologicum, 30(3), pp. 489-493. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:665196 (Accessed 22 February 2025)

Dvornik Radica A, Rudan V, Jureša V, Ivanković D, Rumboldt M, Smoje E, and sur.. Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?. Collegium Antropologicum [Internet]. 2006 September [cited 2025 February 22];30(3):489-493. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:665196

A. Dvornik Radica, et al., "Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?", Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 489-493, September 2006. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:665196. [Accessed: 22 February 2025]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Do we need the "adolescent crisis" diagnosis?
AuthorAna Dvornik-Radica
AuthorVlasta Rudan
AuthorVesna Jureša
AuthorDavor Ivanković
AuthorMirjana Rumboldt
AuthorElvira Smoje
AuthorDavorka Vrdoljak
AuthorNataša Mrduljaš-Đujić
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Public Health and Health Care
Abstract (english)
The aim of the study was to examine patients in adolescent crisis at the beginning of treatment and after a period of 12 months in order to evaluate the relative diagnostic and therapeutic validity. The study included 153 Split University students in adolescent crisis; 90 of them were treated by counseling and 63 served as controls. For diagnosis, Hampstead index and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) multiaxial evaluation were used, allowing a wider insight into personal functioning. The study sample was split in 7 significantly different diagnostic subgroups. The counseling-treated examinees had better personality functioning after 12 months, but did not differ significantly from the control group. Some of their single functions were more severely disturbed at the very beginning. Counseling is a valuable therapeutic and diagnostic tool for adolescent crisis. The assessment must evaluate the entire person, because looking at only one aspect, due to different development and its place, a wrong conclusion may be reached. The "adolescents crisis" entity is clinically relevant.
Abstract (croatian)
Cilj rada bio je pratiti pacijente u adolescentnoj krizi na početku liječenja i nakon 12 mjeseci, kako bi se procijenila dijagnostička i terapijska postignuća. U studiju su uključena 153 studenta u adolescentnoj krizi, koji studiraju na Sveučilištu u Splitu. 90 od njih liječeno je savjetovanjem, a 63 studenta su bili kontrolna grupa. Pri dijagnostici poremećaja rabili smo Hampstead index i Multiaksijalnu procjenu po Dijagnostičkom i Statističkom Priručniku za Mentalne Poremećaje – četvrta revizija (DSM-IV), što je omogućilo širi uvid u unutarnje funkcioniranje osobe. Ispitivana grupa podijeljena je u 7 dijagnostičkih podgrupa, koje su se statistički značajno međusobno razlikovale. Ispitanici liječeni savjetovanjem, pokazivali su bolje funkcioniranje osobnosti nakon 12 mjeseci liječenja, premda razlika prema kontrolnoj grupi nije statistički značajna. U pojedinim funkcijama osobnosti, liječeni pacijenti na početku liječenja, imali su teže poremećaje. Savjetovanje je dobra terapijska i dijagnostička metoda u liječenju adolescentne krize. Pri procjeni, potrebno je obuhvatiti čitavu osobu, budući da promatranje pojedinih parametara, zbog različitog razvoja i brzine tijeka, može zavesti na pogrešno zaključivanje. Dijagnoza adolescentna kriza je klinički važna.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleCollegium Antropologicum
Numberingvol. 30, no. 3, pp. 489-493
p-ISSN0350-6134
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:665196
Publication2006-09
Document URLhttps://hrcak.srce.hr/27572
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2024-03-28 10:58:52