prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies
  Download
PDF 696.26 KB
Scientific paper - Original scientific paper
Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies
Neonatology, 121 (2024), 6; 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1159/000538808
Trevisanuto, Daniele; Gizzi, Camilla; Cavallin, Francesco; Beke, Artur; Buonocore, Giuseppe; Charitou, Antonia; Cucerea, Manuela; Filipović-Grčić, Boris; Jekova, Nelly Georgieva; Koç, Esin; Saldanha, Joana; Stoniene, Dalia; Varendi, Heili; De Bernardo, Giuseppe; Madar, John; Hogeveen, Marije; Orfeo, Luigi; Mosca, Fabio; Vertecchi, Giulia; Moretti, Corrado More authors...

Cite this document

Trevisanuto, D., Gizzi, C., Cavallin, F., Beke, A., Buonocore, G., Charitou, A. ... Moretti, C. (2024). Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies. Neonatology, 121. (6), 780-790. doi: 10.1159/000538808

Trevisanuto, Daniele, et al. "Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies." Neonatology, vol. 121, no. 6, 2024, pp. 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1159/000538808

Trevisanuto, Daniele, Camilla Gizzi, Francesco Cavallin, Artur Beke, Giuseppe Buonocore, Antonia Charitou, Manuela Cucerea, et al. "Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies." Neonatology 121, no. 6 (2024): 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1159/000538808

Trevisanuto, D., et al. (2024) 'Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies', Neonatology, 121(6), pp. 780-790. doi: 10.1159/000538808

Trevisanuto D, Gizzi C, Cavallin F, Beke A, Buonocore G, Charitou A, and sur.. Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies. Neonatology [Internet]. 2024 June [cited 2025 April 25];121(6):780-790. doi: 10.1159/000538808

D. Trevisanuto, et al., "Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies", Neonatology, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 780-790, June 2024. [Online]. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:794426. [Accessed: 25 April 2025]

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
Title (english)Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies
AuthorDaniele Trevisanuto
AuthorCamilla Gizzi
AuthorFrancesco Cavallin
AuthorArtur Beke
AuthorGiuseppe Buonocore
AuthorAntonia Charitou
AuthorManuela Cucerea
AuthorBoris Filipović-Grčić
AuthorNelly Georgieva Jekova
AuthorEsin Koç
AuthorJoana Saldanha
AuthorDalia Stoniene
AuthorHeili Varendi
AuthorGiuseppe De Bernardo
AuthorJohn Madar
AuthorMarije Hogeveen
AuthorLuigi Orfeo
AuthorFabio Mosca
AuthorGiulia Vertecchi
AuthorCorrado Moretti
Author's institutionUniversity of Zagreb
School of Medicine
(Department of Pediatrics)
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		BIOMEDICINE AND HEALTHCARE
Clinical Medical Sciences
Pediatrics
Abstract (english)
Introduction: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) use in neonatal resuscitation is limited despite existing evidence and recommendations. This survey investigated the knowledge and experience of healthcare providers on the use of the LMA and explored barriers and solutions for implementation. Methods: This online, cross-sectional survey on LMA in neonatal resuscitation involved healthcare professionals of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS). Results: A total of 858 healthcare professionals from 42 countries participated in the survey. Only 6% took part in an LMA-specific course. Some delivery rooms were not equipped with LMA (26.1%). LMA was mainly considered after the failure of a face mask (FM) or endotracheal tube (ET), while the first choice was limited to neonates with upper airway malformations. LMA and FM were considered easier to position but less effective than ET, while LMA was considered less invasive than ET but more invasive than FM. Participants felt less competent and experienced with LMA than FM and ET. The lack of confidence in LMA was perceived as the main barrier to its implementation in neonatal resuscitation. More training, supervision, and device availability in delivery wards were suggested as possible actions to overcome those barriers. Conclusion: Our survey confirms previous findings on limited knowledge, experience, and confidence with LMA, which is usually considered an option after the failure of FM/ET. Our findings highlight the need for increasing the availability of LMA in delivery wards. Moreover, increasing LMA training and having an LMA expert supervisor during clinical practice may improve the implementation of LMA use in neonatal clinical practice.
Keywords (english)
Languageenglish
Publication typeScientific paper - Original scientific paper
Publication statusPublished
Peer reviewPeer review
Publication versionPublished version
Journal titleNeonatology
Numberingvol. 121, no. 6, pp. 780-790
p-ISSN1661-7800
e-ISSN1661-7819
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000538808
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:794426
Publication2024-06
Document URLhttps://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000538808
Type of resourceText
Access conditionsOpen access
Terms of useLicence Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) icon
Created on2025-02-03 09:51:56