prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies
  Preuzmi
PDF 696.26 KB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies
Neonatology, 121 (2024), 6; 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1159/000538808
Trevisanuto, Daniele; Gizzi, Camilla; Cavallin, Francesco; Beke, Artur; Buonocore, Giuseppe; Charitou, Antonia; Cucerea, Manuela; Filipović-Grčić, Boris; Jekova, Nelly Georgieva; Koç, Esin; Saldanha, Joana; Stoniene, Dalia; Varendi, Heili; De Bernardo, Giuseppe; Madar, John; Hogeveen, Marije; Orfeo, Luigi; Mosca, Fabio; Vertecchi, Giulia; Moretti, Corrado Više autora...

Citirajte ovaj rad

Trevisanuto, D., Gizzi, C., Cavallin, F., Beke, A., Buonocore, G., Charitou, A. ... Moretti, C. (2024). Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies. Neonatology, 121. (6), 780-790. doi: 10.1159/000538808

Trevisanuto, Daniele, et al. "Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies." Neonatology, vol. 121, br. 6, 2024, str. 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1159/000538808

Trevisanuto, Daniele, Camilla Gizzi, Francesco Cavallin, Artur Beke, Giuseppe Buonocore, Antonia Charitou, Manuela Cucerea, et al. "Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies." Neonatology 121, br. 6 (2024): 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1159/000538808

Trevisanuto, D., et al. (2024) 'Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies', Neonatology, 121(6), str. 780-790. doi: 10.1159/000538808

Trevisanuto D, Gizzi C, Cavallin F, Beke A, Buonocore G, Charitou A, i sur.. Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies. Neonatology [Internet]. 06.2024. [pristupljeno 05.04.2025.];121(6):780-790. doi: 10.1159/000538808

D. Trevisanuto, et al., "Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies", Neonatology, vol. 121, br. 6, str. 780-790, Lipanj 2024. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:794426. [Citirano: 05.04.2025.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:794426
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Laryngeal Mask Airway in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Survey of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies
AutorDaniele Trevisanuto
AutorCamilla Gizzi
AutorFrancesco Cavallin
AutorArtur Beke
AutorGiuseppe Buonocore
AutorAntonia Charitou
AutorManuela Cucerea
AutorBoris Filipović-Grčić
AutorNelly Georgieva Jekova
AutorEsin Koç
AutorJoana Saldanha
AutorDalia Stoniene
AutorHeili Varendi
AutorGiuseppe De Bernardo
AutorJohn Madar
AutorMarije Hogeveen
AutorLuigi Orfeo
AutorFabio Mosca
AutorGiulia Vertecchi
AutorCorrado Moretti
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Zagrebu
Medicinski fakultet
(KATEDRA ZA PEDIJATRIJU)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Pedijatrija
Sažetak (engleski)
Introduction: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) use in neonatal resuscitation is limited despite existing evidence and recommendations. This survey investigated the knowledge and experience of healthcare providers on the use of the LMA and explored barriers and solutions for implementation. Methods: This online, cross-sectional survey on LMA in neonatal resuscitation involved healthcare professionals of the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS). Results: A total of 858 healthcare professionals from 42 countries participated in the survey. Only 6% took part in an LMA-specific course. Some delivery rooms were not equipped with LMA (26.1%). LMA was mainly considered after the failure of a face mask (FM) or endotracheal tube (ET), while the first choice was limited to neonates with upper airway malformations. LMA and FM were considered easier to position but less effective than ET, while LMA was considered less invasive than ET but more invasive than FM. Participants felt less competent and experienced with LMA than FM and ET. The lack of confidence in LMA was perceived as the main barrier to its implementation in neonatal resuscitation. More training, supervision, and device availability in delivery wards were suggested as possible actions to overcome those barriers. Conclusion: Our survey confirms previous findings on limited knowledge, experience, and confidence with LMA, which is usually considered an option after the failure of FM/ET. Our findings highlight the need for increasing the availability of LMA in delivery wards. Moreover, increasing LMA training and having an LMA expert supervisor during clinical practice may improve the implementation of LMA use in neonatal clinical practice.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaNeonatology
Brojčani podacivol. 121, br. 6, str. 780-790
p-ISSN1661-7800
e-ISSN1661-7819
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000538808
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:794426
Datum objave publikacije2024-06
URL dokumentahttps://karger.com/doi/10.1159/000538808
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Imenovanje-Nekomercijalno 4.0 međunarodna (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2025-02-03 09:51:56