prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials
  Preuzmi
PDF 736.05 KB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 23 (2022), 1; 31. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2301031
Skelin, Marko; Katić, Josip; Šarčević, David; Rahelić, Dario; Lucijanić, Marko; Rešić, Arnes; Puljević, Mislav; Javor, Eugen

Citirajte ovaj rad

Skelin, M., Katić, J., Šarčević, D., Rahelić, D., Lucijanić, M., Rešić, A. ... Javor, E. (2022). Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 23. (1). doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2301031

Skelin, Marko, et al. "Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials." Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 23, br. 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2301031

Skelin, Marko, Josip Katić, David Šarčević, Dario Rahelić, Marko Lucijanić, Arnes Rešić, Mislav Puljević i Eugen Javor. "Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials." Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine 23, br. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2301031

Skelin, M., et al. (2022) 'Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials', Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 23(1). doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2301031

Skelin M, Katić J, Šarčević D, Rahelić D, Lucijanić M, Rešić A, i sur.. Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine [Internet]. 01.2022. [pristupljeno 11.04.2024.];23(1). doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2301031

M. Skelin, et al., "Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials", Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 23, br. 1, Siječanj 2022. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:409454. [Citirano: 11.04.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:105:409454
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Comparison of media and academic attention of recently published positive and neutral or negative randomized cardiovascular clinical trials
AutorMarko Skelin
AutorJosip Katić
AutorDavid Šarčević
AutorDario Rahelić
AutorMarko Lucijanić
AutorArnes Rešić
AutorMislav Puljević
AutorEugen Javor
Autorova ustanovaSveučilište u Zagrebu
Medicinski fakultet
(KATEDRA ZA INTERNU MEDICINU)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Interna medicina
Sažetak (engleski)
Background: Citations are used to assess the importance of authors, articles and journals in the scientific community, but do not examine how they affect general public journal readership. The Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) is a new metric for measuring media attention of the published paper. ----- Methods: We examined cardiovascular (CV) randomized clinical trials (RCTs), published in the 3 highest Web of Science Impact Factor journals (Journal Citation Reports 2019: category "Medicine, General & Internal") and in the 3 highest Web of Science Impact Factor CV journals (Journal Citation Reports 2019: category "Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems"), through the calendar year of 2017, 2018 and 2019. The primary outcomes were the assessment of the difference between number of citations and AAS among positive and negative CV RCTs. ----- Results: Among the included 262 RCTs, more positive CV RCTs were published (p = 0.002). There was no significant statistical difference between the positive and negative trials, considering the number of citations (p = 0.61). Interestingly, positive trials had a tendency towards a higher AAS (p = 0.058). The correlation between the AAS and the number of citations was moderate positively correlated (ρ = 0.47, p < 0.001). ----- Conclusion: We did not find any differences between CV RCTs with positive vs CV RCTs with negative results considering the number of their citations. A tendency towards a higher AAS among positive CV RCTs could indicate higher activity on social media regarding CV trials with positive results. A higher number of published positive CV RCTs among all published CV RCTs could indicate the presence of publication bias but further investigation of unpublished RCTs in trial registries (e.g., clinicaltrials.gov) is needed.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Brojčani podacivol. 23, br. 1, 31
p-ISSN1530-6550
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2301031
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:105:409454
Datum objave publikacije2022-01
URL dokumentahttps://imrpress.com/journal/RCM/23/1/10.31083/j.rcm2301031
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Imenovanje 4.0 međunarodna (CC BY 4.0)
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2022-11-14 12:14:32